Best Compact SUVs of 2022

Compact SUVs are a feature of the world of cars that is always developing, in an atmosphere of fierce competition, aiming to keep car lovers in their camp, and all car companies strive to occupy the top in every category, and among the cars the compact SUV category stands out. It occupies a large position in the global market,

A compact SUV or compact SUV is a class of small SUV that is larger than a small SUV, but smaller than a mid-size SUV. However, there is no official definition of the size or dimensions of this market segment. Furthermore, some manufacturers have marketed the same model name on cars of different sizes over time.

The most common distinction between crossover versions and compact SUVs is that the former is based on a single-body platform and is vehicle-based, while SUVs use the chassis over chassis commonly used in trucks. However, manufacturers and common usage have blurred the two terms. Many of the newer vehicles are classified as compact SUVs while they are technically compact crossovers built on the C-class compact passenger car platform.

Over the past two years, compact SUVs have seen a number of competing cars redesigned in this list, namely the Hyundai Tucson and Nissan Rogue, and the Volkswagen Tiguan was the last comparison winner, and today we present to you six of the best compact SUVs, or compact SUVs.

In addition to the change in the rankings, we’ve seen a reinforcement of some trends in the compact SUV world, including two undesirable ones: the proliferation of touch-sensitive controls instead of mechanical buttons and a needless ride quality, compact SUVs are essentially vectors. family. You don’t need that extra strength,

The compact SUV segment this year was the highest in terms of specifications offered, equipped with four-cylinder engines and all-wheel drive. The Ford Escape and Toyota RAV were excluded from this year’s list because their brands refused to participate in our comparison of compact SUVs.

In our list, compact SUVs are ranked in descending order from highest to lowest, and you can find out the comprehensive evaluation of each compact SUV in this list by clicking on the image or the name of the car. We have tested all these cars, taking into account the testing of the latest versions of them, in addition to the previous version,

Our test results apply to compact SUVs, and do not include all competing cars in this category. Results are limited to vehicles we tested as equipped and priced. You can check out all the finer details by clicking on the winning car.

1. 2021 Nissan Rogue Platinum
2. 2022 Hyundai Tucson LimitedI scored 383 points out of 500 points
3. 2021 Subaru Forester Touring
4. 2022 Volkswagen Tiguan SEL R-LineI scored 358 points out of 500 points
5. 2022 Mitsubishi Outlander SEL 2.5 S-AWCI scored 338 points out of 500 points
6. 2021 Honda CR-V Touring

6. Honda CR-V Touring 2021 scored 335 points

Honda’s CR-V ranked first in one judging category, but ranked last in four categories, sharing two more category losses with other models in a tie. Touring: I got 335 out of 540 points

The CR-V was redesigned in 2017, taking second place at the time, and it was distinguished among the compact SUV, but it fell from fourth place in the previous ranking due to competitor improvements and its own flaws. They’re the best models in terms of handling, but they lag behind in family features, and their powertrain is more memorable for bad reasons than good. The CR-V ranked first in one judging category, but ranked last in four categories, sharing two more category losses with other models in a tie.

We tried a $36,775 Honda car with a 190-horsepower transmission and a 1.5-liter turbocharged four-cylinder engine mated to a continuously variable automatic transmission with all-wheel drive. 0-10 mph in 1.2 seconds, taking fifth place. Its fuel consumption is 27/32/29 mpg. The Honda CR-V finished first in one judging category, but ranked last in four categories, sharing two more category losses with other models in a tie.

What distinguishes the Honda CR-V from a compact SUV

We evaluated braking and pedal feel, and the Honda CR-V was the only winner in the judging category. It turns out that they have brakes not available in other compact SUVs, and the CR-V brakes have the distinctive handling and feedback characteristics of performance cars.” In-cabin storage was criticized, especially the missing space between the center console’s sliding lid and armrest, and the judges scored for the CR-V just one point, despite its large cabin and plenty of options, but the items are large.

And in terms of ride quality: Ranked last in the compact SUV class, the CR-V wasn’t the best of the bunch, and it had less impact than most competitors, though it sucked up bumps hard without the suspension or body feeling cumbersome or out of control. In terms of value, Honda had the highest EPA-rated fuel economy, and it’s also the most accelerating, but it was the slowest in the 0-10 mile line among compact SUVs.

Disadvantages of Honda CR-V compared to compact SUVs

Too bad that the Honda CR-V ranks last among SUVs in terms of safety, because it lacks a 360-degree camera system, front parking sensors, and because it’s the only model that doesn’t have an automatic rear brake. The CR-V was the noisiest compact SUV of the group due to its engine, road noise took the lead, it had a raspy, hollow sound, noticeably outdated touchscreen user interface and small size, screen movements were choppy when switching from menu to menu,

Applications and sources: Last place went to the CR-V compared to the compact SUV, in part due to its lack of wireless connectivity to phone systems, and the front data ports for power-intensive applications were up to 1.5 amps. The way the CR-V’s powertrain stumbles when accelerating from a stop is incredibly frustrating — not to mention potentially dangerous when trying to get around traffic or cross a busy road.

5. 2022 Mitsubishi Outlander 338 points

The Verdict: The 2022 Outlander is much better than its predecessor, and it functions as a sort of discounted Nissan Rogue but falls short due to confusing styling choices inside and out, and in particular, the standard third row of seats that does more harm than good.

We tested a $35,295 Mitsubishi Outlander with a 181-horsepower powertrain and a 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine; a continuously variable automatic transmission; All-wheel drive, 0-60 mph acceleration in 9.1 seconds, third place, 0-10 mph line acceleration in 1.0 seconds, third place, city/highway/combined fuel economy rating: 24.

The Mitsubishi Outlander remained many years before it was redesigned in 2022, but it is now a sister to the Nissan Rogue, but the design issue was related to the “free” third-row seat, which adds little value at the same time, but lowers the Outlander’s scores among other compact SUVs. It scored one win in driver assistance technology, but lost eight points.

What distinguishes Mitsubishi Outlander among compact SUVs

The Outlander’s user interface is good, and the heating and air conditioning controls look flowy like touch-sensitive panels, with the big plus of a high-quality main screen, and a bright, easy-to-read dashboard that gives it an edge among other compact SUVs. The Outlander’s USB-A and -C ports were clever and had just what we needed without the need for power adapters. The interior quality of the Outlander’s interior resembles Rogue’s first- and second-row padded leather seats and looks luxurious, and overall quality scores were higher than others in our compact SUV test.

Acceleration in the Outlander is good, when the engine is high, it accelerates quickly, allowing for quick lane changes on the highway or a quick sprint through four lanes of traffic, and the suction power of a regular four-cylinder engine is sufficient, despite the heavy weight of the Outlander.

Disadvantages of Mitsubishi Outlander compared to compact SUVs

The first- and second-row seats feature lovable leather seats, but the hard plastic on the doors is cheap and hollow, but the worst part compared to other compact four-wheel drive cars is the third-row seats, no berths, no legroom in the third row, and barely enough for a small child. The third row hurt the Outlander’s results compared to other compact SUV classes. With regard to handling, its extra weight has affected the way it is processed, and it reacts to inputs more slowly.

The outlander’s traditional visibility was the worst among other SUVs, with the hood high and obstructing the front view, and in the rear, the large third-row headrests block part of the windows and complicating matters is that the seats do not fold but are removed and stowed manually. The center console design also reduces storage space in the front for no reason, with space lost in the center console area, and in terms of ride quality there is a lot of harsh effect in the bumps, due to the Mitsubishi Outlander’s stiff suspension, causing a lack of control over the large bumps.

4. 2022 Volkswagen Tiguan SEL R-Line 358 points

The Verdict: The Volkswagen Tiguan fell, and it owes its downfall to “upgrading” strengths like stale controls with acceleration response remaining constant, rather than addressing lackluster interior quality. Although assets such as the cabin and luggage compartment space remain.

We tested a $37,790 Volkswagen Tiguan, with a 184-horsepower powertrain, a 2.0-liter turbocharged four-cylinder engine, and an eight-speed automatic transmission, with all-wheel drive, acceleration 0-60 mph: 9.7 seconds, sixth place , 0-10 mph line acceleration: 1.5 seconds, sixth, with city/highway/combined fuel economy rating: 21/28/24 mpg.

The Volkswagen Tiguan took first prize in the previous two competitions and is now down. Details are all below, compounded by the R-Line’s trim level that has 20-inch wheels with intriguingly high inflation specs, and lowered a full mile of fuel economy compared to other compact SUVs. The push took a turn that affected her, and the Tiguan won three classes and tied the fourth Test and lost four Tests.

What distinguishes the Volkswagen Tiguan among the compact SUV

The Volkswagen Tiguan ranked best in the handling test, outperforming compact SUVs in cornering and cornering, although it is the heaviest of them all.

The Tiguan took first place in the segment with a cargo volume behind the third row of 20.3 cubic feet, bolstered by amenities other compact SUVs lack. The Tiguan took first place in the safety features calculation by including almost everything in the list of safety and security technologies, and none of the compact SUVs scored such points in the safety and security specifications. The Tiguan offers long, upright windshields, good front and over-the-shoulder views while driving and outstanding visibility.

Disadvantages of Volkswagen Tiguan compared to compact SUVs

The interior of the Tiguan looks good, but the lining is thin in places, even the seats, and there is a lot of hard plastic in the cabin, and the effect of tire noise has reduced its results among compact SUVs. The trail runs at high speeds rather than at low speeds, and the compact SUV lacks the value advantage but the Tiguan clearly loses.

The tires of the Tiguan made the car feel tougher and cheaper to ride than it really is, and the user interface on the Tiguan only scored one point, for the absence of the old controls in the car that were “upgraded” with touch-sensitive versions that looked dumb The traditional buttons were less annoying, they required pressing More than expected, although the volume is good, and the adjustment knob is fine, there were comments on the steering wheel.

3. Subaru Forester Touring 2021 scored 366 points

The Verdict: The Subaru Forester delivered a comfortable ride and great visibility, and the Touring came with a surprisingly luxurious cabin, but it held back with dispersed engine noise and an unnecessarily complex ergonomics.

We tested a $35,945 Subar Forester Touring, with a 182-horsepower transmission and a 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine; With a continuously variable automatic transmission and all-wheel drive, it achieved 0-60 mph in 9.6 seconds, in fifth, and 0-10 mph in 1.1 seconds, in fourth, with city/highway fuel economy rating. / combined: 26/33/29 mpg.

The Forester was freshly redesigned for 2019, but the Forester slipped as old models often do in this competitive arena among compact SUVs, but it maintained its comfortable ride quality, and left it with a disappointing user interface. She won two judging categories, tied for first place with two other cars, and lost only one test.

What distinguishes Subaru Forester Touring among compact SUVs

A straight windshield and additional windows behind the A-pillars help give the driver a clear view of the horizon, and the Forester’s good sight lines earn it the highest score in the compact SUV segment. Built around the front and rear passenger saddles with comfortable seats and well-padded touch points, the ride quality makes the Forester one of the softest rides amongst compact SUVs.

The Forester gives rear-seat passengers plenty of options for storing their belongings, and the Subbar gives the rear seats plenty of space, away from the front seats. The rear seat cushion is flat and has no central camber, and storage space takes the lead by pockets in the rear seat back with three pockets of different sizes. for flexibility.

Disadvantages of Subaru Forester Touring compared to compact SUVs

The loss of one class from the Forester is in part due to its smaller size, which results in less trunk and cargo volume, and it is the only car among compact SUVs to have an electric tailgate that lacks a hands-free feature. Constant wind noise makes it difficult to drive long distances, and the Forester’s user interface is quite complex, with a dual screen system, but the top screen often reflects information on the main screen.

The front seats were covered in nice materials with soft cushions, but the cushions were flat and wide without too much contouring to tire the body, and in terms of value for money nothing else stood out. In addition, free maintenance is not included for all models. Also, the usual sunroof now seems to be an advantage in the world of large panoramic sunroofs.

2. Hyundai Tucson Limited 2022 scored 383 points

The Verdict: Hyundai Tucson comes close to defining the perfect formula for a compact SUV, but the touch-sensitive central controls, lower cabin-dominant value, and a few minor deficiencies cost it the prize.

We tested a $37,454 Hyundai Tucson, with a 187-horsepower drivetrain and a 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine; With an eight-speed automatic transmission, all-wheel drive, 0-60 mph acceleration in 9.2 seconds, 4th and 0-10 mph in 0.88 seconds, 1st and city/highway/fuel economy combined: 24 /29/26 mpg.

The 2022 Hyundai Tucson has been redesigned, and is completely different from the model that finished third in 2019. Thanks to the upgrades and power of Hyundai, the 2022 edition also ranked first in terms of value , and the Tucson won three direct judging classes, and tied first with other cars in four other tests. She did not lose any test and fell to second place, only four points behind the first winner.

What distinguishes Hyundai Tucson Limited among compact SUVs

The Tucson’s powertrain was quieter than the rest of its compact SUV rivals, and perhaps one of the quietest non-luxury cars out there. The engine version hums a little at high rpm, comes with comfortable front seats, with right support only, heated and cooled, and offers equal adjustment for the driver and passenger seats, with luxury headrests that fit a luxury Mercedes, and in terms of ride quality Tucson runs like a class higher, and feels more powerful than its competitors.

The Tucson absorbs big bumps and bumps, with a comfortable medium stiffness but still provides some road feel. The Tucson’s interior remained a third-time favorite in tests, and interesting texture elements, controls and other features were incorporated into the design most notably the blind spot monitor. The Tucson impressed Large Hyundai digital instrument panel with side camera views displayed when the turn signal is on,

Disadvantages of Hyundai Tucson Limited compared to compact SUVs

The user interface in Tucson suffers from inconvenient touch-sensitive central controls that turn out to be difficult to use while on the move. In-cab storage, the rear cup holders are small, the rear bottle holders are less than needed, and although there are seat back pockets, they are an expandable net, so smaller items will fall out or get caught in the net.

The Hyundai Tucson lacks natural vision due to the high beltline and short windows in the rear compared to its competitors from other compact SUVs, and I really found the rear seats comfortable, but the window sill is too high and limits the outside view of children, and on the other hand, the Tucson rated above average for For interior quality, all judges noted a pronounced solidity in the materials, but the quality does not fall off a cliff in the back seat like the Elantra sedan. A strange hesitation was observed during the wide open throttle that would pause the acceleration, then resume.”

1. Nissan Rogue Platinum 2021 scored 387 points

The Verdict: The Nissan Rogue is stunning with a well-executed interior, modern amenities, and steering gear innocuous enough to let its other attributes shine through.

We tested a $39,685 Nissan Rogue Platinum with a 181-horsepower powertrain and a 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine; mated to a continuously variable automatic transmission; With all-wheel drive, 0-60 mph acceleration in 8.5 seconds, 0-10 mph sprint in 0.93 seconds, second, city/highway/combined fuel economy rating of 25/32/28 miles in the gallon.

The reason for the victory of the Nissan Rogue is not because it took first place in four judging categories, tied first place with two other cars and did not lose any test, but technically, it won because it collected the most points, in a competitive category that includes the best compact SUVs, the most important of which are Not adding a third row. The internal quality is improved. The bad decisions of the competitors were reflected in the increase in Nissan Rogue sales.

What distinguishes Nissan Rogue Platinum among compact SUVs

The second-row Nissan Rogue treats passengers like first-class citizens, with climate controls and heated seats—with a more usable center seat for taller adults—and impressing the graphics quality of the 9-inch touchscreen and 12-inch digital instrument panel, bolstered by repeatable physical buttons. The main menu, in addition to premium storage inside the cabin, also offers charging options for USB-A and -C ports, along with a wireless charging pad.

The Nissan Rogue replicates its expensive luxury sibling Infiniti, with diamond-cushioned leather seats, plenty of room at its focal points, and outdone all-compact SUVs, and there’s no doubt that the Rogue’s top-of-the-line cabin in platinum trim reaches the top-volume class. For its price, with a good cabin, but it didn’t deliver the luxury and quality we’ve seen in high-end Hyundai products, the Rogue’s acceleration is good and it takes a second to 60 mph in 8.5 seconds.

Disadvantages of Nissan Rogue Platinum compared to compact SUVs

The judges and users agreed that they didn’t like the quality of the Rogue’s ride without knowing why. And you can feel the difficulty of hanging in the big bumps, and you lose versatility points because the seat doesn’t slip like the Outlander and Tiguan. The front seats have good-sized but flat bolsters and may be a bigger problem for the front passenger, and I never expected the Rogue to be the most expensive car in our compact SUV test.